What Companies Say About Working with Luxauct Counsel

"We were uncertain whether a contract dispute with a supplier was worth pursuing. The Pre-Action Strategy Memorandum gave us a clear written assessment within a few weeks. It set out the position honestly — including the points that were not in our favour — and helped us make a proper decision rather than proceeding on instinct. We ended up settling on reasonable terms before filing, which was probably the right outcome."

Pre-Action Memorandum — April 2025

"We engaged Luxauct Counsel for a mid-sized commercial dispute that had been running for some time with another firm. The handover was handled efficiently and the pleadings were reviewed and strengthened before the next hearing. The written reports after each stage were something we had not experienced with previous counsel — they were detailed and direct. The matter concluded at first instance with a judgment substantially in our favour."

First-Instance Representation — March 2025

"The Pre-Action Memorandum was more thorough than we expected. It examined the contract clause by clause and provided a plain account of what Thai law said about our position. The alternative pathways note was particularly useful — we had not seriously considered mediation before, and the note gave us enough information to consider it seriously. We proceeded with a negotiated settlement rather than filing, which saved considerable time."

Pre-Action Memorandum — April 2025

"As a foreign-headquartered company with a dispute in Thailand, we needed counsel who could coordinate with our Singapore team and manage the Thai proceedings independently. The Substantial Litigation Programme worked well — the quarterly reports were structured and gave our board a clear picture at each stage. The coordination between Bangkok and Singapore was managed without confusion. The matter is ongoing but the process so far has been well-managed."

Substantial Litigation Programme — Ongoing since January 2025

"We used the First-Instance service for a breach of contract claim against a supplier. The process was explained clearly from the outset and the fee structure meant we knew what we were committing to. The hearing attendance was professional — the counsel presented our case in a calm and organised manner. The process took about eighteen months, which is in line with what we were told to expect. The outcome was satisfactory."

First-Instance Representation — March 2025

"Our matter involved an IP dispute that fell under the jurisdiction of the Central Intellectual Property and International Trade Court. Luxauct Counsel's familiarity with that court's procedural requirements was evident from the start. The memorandum stage helped us understand the specific procedural route, and when we decided to proceed, the representation was carried out with appropriate care. The court's specialised procedures were navigated without difficulty."

First-Instance Representation — February 2025